Robert Stolarik for The New York TimesSome demonstrators that walked from Zuccotti Park in lower Manhattan to the Brooklyn Bridge were arrested on Saturday when they blocked traffic on the Brooklyn-bound lanes. Updated, 7:58 p.m. | In a tense showdown above the East River, the police arrested about 500 demonstrators from the Occupy Wall Street protests who took to the roadway as they tried to cross the Brooklyn Bridge on Saturday afternoon.
The police did not immediately release precise arrest figures, but said it was the choice of those marchers that led to the swift enforcement.
“Protesters who used the Brooklyn Bridge walkway were not arrested,” said the head police spokesman, Paul J. Browne. “Those who took over the Brooklyn-bound roadway, and impeded vehicle traffic, were arrested.”
But many protesters said that they thought the police had tricked and trapped them, allowing them onto the bridge and even escorting them across, only to surround them in orange netting after hundreds of them had entered.
“The cops watched and did nothing, indeed, seemed to guide us on to the roadway,” said Jesse A. Myerson, a media coordinator for Occupy Wall Street who was in the march but was not arrested.
Things came to a head shortly after 4 p.m., as the 1,500 or so marchers reached the foot of the Brooklyn-bound car lanes of the bridge, just east of City Hall.
In their march north from Zuccotti Park in lower Manhattan — headquarters for the last two weeks of a protest movement against what demonstrators call inequities in the economic system — they had stayed on the sidewalks, forming a long column of humanity penned in by officers on scooters.
Where the entrance to the bridge narrowed their path, some marchers, including organizers, stuck to the generally agreed-upon route and headed up onto the wooden walkway that runs between and about 15 feet above the bridge’s traffic lanes.
But about 20 others headed for the Brooklyn-bound roadway, said Christopher T. Dunn of the New York Civil Liberties Union, who accompanied the march. Some of them chanted “take the bridge.” They were met by a handful of high-level police supervisors, who blocked the way and announced repeatedly through bullhorns that the marchers were blocking the roadway and that if they continued to do so, they would be subject to arrest.
There were no physical barriers, though, and at one point, the marchers began walking up the roadway with the police commanders in front of them – seeming, from a distance, as if they were leading the way. The Chief of Department Joseph J. Esposito, and a horde of other white-shirted commanders, was among them.
Ozier Muhammad/The New York TimesPolice secured some protesters’ hands with plastic ties.After allowing the protesters to walk about a third of the way to Brooklyn, the police then cut the marchers off and surrounded them with orange nets on both sides, trapping hundreds of people, said Mr. Dunn. As protesters at times chanted “white shirts, white shirts,” officers began making arrests, at one point plunging briefly into the crowd to grab a man.
The police said that those arrested were taken to several police stations and are being charged with disorderly conduct, at a minimum.
A freelance reporter for The Times, Natasha Lennard, was among those arrested. She was later released.
Mr. Dunn said he was concerned that those in the back of the column who might not have heard the warnings “would have had no idea that it was not okay to walk on the roadway of the bridge.” Mr. Browne said that individuals that were in the rear of the crowd that may not have heard the warnings were not arrested and were free to leave.
Earlier in the afternoon, as many as 10 Department of Correction buses, big enough to hold 20 prisoners apiece, had been dispatched from Rikers Island in what one law enforcement official said was “a planned move on the protesters.”
Etan Ben-Ami, 56, a psychotherapist from Brooklyn who was up on the walkway, said that the police seemed to make a conscious decision to allow the protesters to claim the road. “They weren’t pushed back,” he said. “It seemed that they moved at the same time.”
Mr. Ben-Ami said he left the walkway and joined the crowd on the road. “It seemed completely permitted,” he said. “There wasn’t a single policeman saying ‘don’t do this’.”
He added: “We thought they were escorting us because they wanted us to be safe.” He left the bridge when he saw officers unrolling the nets as they prepared to make arrests. Many others who had been on the roadway were allowed to walk back down to Manhattan.
Mr. Browne said that the police did not trick the protesters into going onto the bridge.
“This was not a trap,” he said. “They were warned not to proceed.”
In related protests elsewhere in the country, 25 people were arrested in Boston for trespassing while protesting Bank of America’s foreclosure practices, according to Eddy Chrispin, a spokesperson for the Boston Police Department. The protesters were on the grounds and blocking the entrance to the building, Mr. Chrispin said.
Natasha Lennard, William K. Rashbaum and Elizabeth A. Harris contributed reporting.




I used to be more than happy to seek out this internet-site.I wanted to thanks in your time for this glorious read!! I positively enjoying each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post
cisco exams // cissp practice test // cissp practice test // citrix answers // comptia exams // c-tadm51-70 practice exam // e20-001 answers // e20-018 exams //
the 8 minute video clearly shows the police leading them on to the bridge in 2 different places.
It sure looks like an entrapment. Like they did lead them down onto the road.
I agree completely. The people were calm and peaceful and appeared to walk on the street and on to the bridge because that is where they believed the police wanted them to go.
What were the people arrested for, blocking the bridge? That is something that likely would not have happened if the police had not led them down the street and on to the bridge.
This definitely looks like entrapment, but what did the police or the city of New York gain from this, aside a bunch of really angry people?
ssi attorneys
I was there but stayed off the street because that was what initiated the problems last Saturday. One activist told me that during a 2004 protest, I think it was during the RNC, that police led protesters on a route only to arrest them later.
this was so unfair. It sounds like they were not going to go on the road part until the cops allowed them to. This sounds like a trap. The police must have had planned since they Had 20 police buses already called out.
Have re-posted this like mad all over the blabbosphere. And at newspaper sites. Long live citizen journalism!
FINALLY !!! after 14 days, Occupy Wall Street hits the Google News Page !!! (10/2) BETTER LATE THAN NEVER !!! Thanks Google !!! !!! !!!
http://www.intelifaqs.com/FB/images/googlenews.png
white shirts with scrambled eggs in their caps are the officers...the blue shirts are the rank and file...just like in the military..nothing spectacular about this...nothing new...other than we protesters giving them a new name.
No, nothing new about the white-blue rankings, but the major misbehavior in NYC so far, it seems, have been the white shirts. No doubt, not all blues are good. But when the peppar spray incident happened it was a white shirt commander and one of the blues said -- I can't believe he just maced her. And one of the women sprayed mentioned in an article she wrote in Boston the big difference between how the white-shrted commanders were behaving vs. the blue collar police who were treating protesters much more appropriately -- as she described it.
low ranking cops are real good at misbehaving...in fact they misbehave better when they are in a gang and have only one victim...cops under capitalism are not good and serve no good purpose...save for maybe directing traffic.
Sometimes some news that isn't fit to print manages to slip it, but luckily its quickly removed from America's paper of record.
Credit goes to journalist Brenda Norrell of Censored News for bringing to our attention the quick change of facts reported by the New York Times,
Yes, very crazy stuff. I own some office space New York and can only imagine what the scene must be like over there!
Thanks for letting us know. Great work, Brenda. I got it through my Facebook page. Great catch!
Brenda brought our attention to it but was not the original one who discovered it. She was the one that spread it via her huge face book, her blog and journalist following.
The original person is not known publicly yet, but when we do learn then hopefully we will give credit due this activist.
We also must give credit to those like Brenda who tirelessly work as a journalist and blogger to expose what the corporate media censors or biasly reports. She may not always be the originating source, but she is always quick to expose censorship and media manipulation.
The point is the truth must get out, but those who work hard to make this happen need to be recognized or at least acknowledged for their tireless contributions in helping to make that happen.
Agreed - excellent catch!
Miami Lawyer
I'm glad we as Americans are standing up for corporate greed. The bail out benefited Wall Steer not us.
http://www.bopfreemasons.info/